The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended execution, confiscation, collection 13.1 million won for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant's mistake and reflects the fact that there are no other criminal records except for those sentenced to a fine of one million won due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in 2002. However, the defendant's crime of this case is disadvantageous circumstances such as the circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and the scope of recommended punishment (six months to one year and four months) according to the sentencing guidelines of the sentencing committee for the sentencing committee / [the scope of recommended punishment] 2 types of sexual traffic crimes in the basic area (such as arranging sexual traffic crimes subject to 6 months to one year and four months), / [1 year and one year] / [4 months] of the basic area of the crime of this case, and there is no special sentencing, so the above assertion by the court below is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.