logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원속초지원 2019.06.14 2019가단14
건물인도 등
Text

1. The Defendant, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties are the Plaintiff:

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet; b.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 25, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D to lease a building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) with a deposit of KRW 15 million, monthly rent of KRW 1100,000,000 from May 25, 2018 to May 25, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”), and thereafter, delivered the instant building to D.

B. D’s lineal ascendants died on September 13, 2018 without spouse and lineal descendants, and D’s lineal ascendants died. As D’s lineal ascendants and descendants died, Defendant B, the spouse of D’s brothers and sisters, and Defendant B, the spouse of D’s (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”) and Defendant B, the spouse of D’s brothers and sisters, become co-inheritors (each share of 1/5), and the remaining Defendants except Defendant B, who reported the qualified acceptance of D’s inheritance on December 10, 2018 by this court’s 2018 D’s 1/5 shares). Defendant B also reported the qualified acceptance of D’s inheritance on May 10, 2019, and received the judgment to accept D’s inheritance on May 10, 2019.

C. From December 24, 2018 to December 24, 2018, the Defendants, the successors of D or D, paid the sum of KRW 3,300,000 for three months and KRW 303,80,00 for waterworks and KRW 4,761,50 for electricity and KRW 1,157,700 for electricity and KRW 1,761,50 for electricity and KRW 4,761,50 for waterworks and the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the foregoing delinquency.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the qualified acceptance system separates the inherited property and proprietary property of the inheritor who made the qualified acceptance from the inheritor to the extent of the inherited property, and the heir is liable for the repayment of the inherited property to the extent of the inherited property. The defendants' duty to deliver the building of this case, which is the inherited property

arrow