The degree of reinforced evidence of a confession and the method of such evidence;

The reinforcement evidence of confessions is not related to the whole criminal facts, but to the extent that confessions can be recognized as true and not processed, and such evidence is irrelevant not only to the direct evidence, but also to the circumstantial evidence or indirect evidence.

Article 310 of the Criminal Procedure Act

[Plaintiff-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Domin, Attorneys Park Jong-soo and 1 other, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-Appellee) 90Do1613, Sep. 25, 1990 (Gong1990, 2235)

Defendant

Defendant

Attorney Yu Ho-seok

Seoul High Court Decision 91No169 delivered on June 14, 1991

The appeal is dismissed.

Defendant’s defense counsel’s grounds of appeal

According to the evidence of the first instance court cited by the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant's facts charged in the judgment against the defendant. According to the records of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's trial records, the defendant's first instance court's first instance court's prosecutor's suspect examination protocol as to the defendant in the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of suspect's suspect examination as to the defendant should be denied the admissibility of evidence of the prosecutor's protocol as to the defendant in the first instance court's preparation, and it can be acknowledged that the defendant's confession is not a processed and true, even if it is not a direct evidence or indirect evidence, and it is hard to prove that the defendant's first instance court's second instance court's evidence is insufficient to prove evidence as evidence without any misapprehension of the legal principles as to the remaining facts charged (see Supreme Court Decision 90Do1613, Sep. 25, 190).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Jae-sung (Presiding Justice)