1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, from December 2003 to January 2014, 2014, imported rubber short heat (hereinafter “instant cargo”). The primary Plaintiff is a transportation company transporting the instant cargo from a port of the People’s Republic of China’s Republic of China to a port of Busan, and the primary Plaintiff is a brokerage company, a forwarding agent for the instant cargo.

B. 1) The Defendant has been entrusted with all the affairs related to the export and import of the instant cargo to the AD Customs Brokers Office. 2) The AD Customs Brokers Office selects the company to transport the instant cargo, and has been entrusted with the affairs entrusted by the Defendant, including the preliminary Plaintiff.

3) B claimed transportation charges, import customs clearance expenses, agency fees, etc. for the instant cargo from the Defendant, deducted the shares of the Plaintiff from the passbook in the name of the A certified customs broker office, and paid the remainder to the Preliminary Plaintiff, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 16 evidence, Eul evidence 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion 1: The primary plaintiff transported the freight of the defendant from December 2, 2003 to January 2014 under the cargo transport contract with the defendant. The defendant did not pay to the plaintiff KRW 344,84,851 in total, from April 2, 2012 to September 29, 2012.

Therefore, the defendant's primary plaintiff is KRW 344,844,851.