logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2014.09.19 2014가단7052
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

Reasons

On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff leased (hereinafter “the instant building”) deposit money of KRW 5,00,000,000 monthly rent, KRW 60,000, and the period of April 30, 2014 to the Defendant on April 30, 2012, the Defendant did not pay rent from January 1, 2013, and the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract with the instant complaint on the grounds of overdue payment, and the said warden’s delivery to the Defendant on April 23, 2014, etc., either did not conflict between the parties or may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of pleadings as evidence A and 2.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff and pay the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent, calculated at the rate of KRW 600,000 per month from January 1, 2013 to the date of delivery of the above building.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow