1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On July 31, 2009, the Plaintiff lent KRW 70,000 to the Defendant on July 31, 2009, and received KRW 16,000,000 from the Defendant on October 4, 2011, and thereafter thereafter lent KRW 7,00,000 to the Defendant, and then seek payment of KRW 61,00,000 and delay damages to the Defendant.

According to each of the evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and 4, it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff and the Defendant had lent the above money to the Defendant only with the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(1) The plaintiff and the plaintiff and the defendant had a de facto marital relationship from around 2008, and the plaintiff and C had a same restaurant business as the plaintiff and C. The defendant lent the restaurant business expenses to the plaintiff and C on April 27, 2009, and around June 24, 2009, the above restaurant building was sold by auction at the request of the plaintiff and C, and the above building was received by the plaintiff and C, and the principal and interest of the loan were paid. The defendant alleged that the money transferred from the plaintiff to the defendant was paid by the plaintiff through C in the above process, and that the defendant did not borrowed the above money from the plaintiff, and that the defendant did not borrow the above money from the plaintiff, considering the whole purport of the arguments as stated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the defendant's claim is dismissed, since the plaintiff's claim is without merit.