logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.30 2016나71928
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended by this court is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. On July 31, 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she lent KRW 70 million to the Defendant on the ground that he/she, on July 31, 2009, transferred the said money, and the Defendant asserted that he/she received KRW 70 million transferred from the Plaintiff only partially repaid the money that he/she lent to the Plaintiff and C, and that there was no fact that he/she borrowed money from the Plaintiff.

According to the plaintiff's evidence Nos. 1 and 7, 200,000 won was transferred from the plaintiff's national bank account (D) to the defendant's account. However, according to Gap's statement Nos. 2, 4, 7, 15, 19, and Eul's witness's testimony and arguments, the plaintiff and C jointly operated a separate restaurant of "F" as provided in Nos. 101 and 102 of "F" from around 2008 to the defendant's loan account, and the plaintiff's loan of KRW 1,00,000 to the defendant's loan of KRW 1,000,000,000 and KRW 27,000,000,000 from the plaintiff's loan of KRW 1,60,000 to the defendant's loan of KRW 4,000,000,000 to the defendant's loan of KRW 20,000,00.

Therefore, the plaintiff.

arrow