The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is from May 16, 2013 to May 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) lent a DNA franchise vehicle owned by Crenmana to use it; (b) made it difficult to distinguish a registration license plate by using a white tape; and (c) made it difficult to distinguish a registration license plate.

2. The defendant asserts that the defendant did not have a tape attached to the registration number plate, and that he did not know that the tape was attached even at the time of returning the vehicle.

3. According to the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the Defendant lent and used DNA franchise vehicle from Crenk on May 16, 2013; (b) returned it to Crenk Staff E on May 21, 2013; and (c) the civil petitioner filed a civil petition by affixing a photograph created by “Cren” on May 23, 2013.

E was set up in the court on May 24, 2013, when he was set up in the street from the Defendant, and found the tape in the morning on May 24, 2013. At the time of the first instance trial, E made a statement to the effect that “I would like to ask the Defendant that “I am attached to the same box,” and “I am am off, I am am off the match? I would like to know that the tape is attached. I would like to know that there was a tape. After the police, I had contact in the police, and I would like to say that I asked the Defendant “I am that I would am know that I would have been the same.” This statement to the effect that “I would like to request.”

As to the credibility of the statement, the following circumstances revealed in light of the records, namely, ① the result of a review of the details of sending and sending the cell phone numbers of E and the Defendant, ② there was no fact that E called the Defendant on May 24, 2013, ② The investigation report calls to the police at around 18:00 on June 11, 2013 by the police officer, who is the person in charge after the call with the head office.