Of the part against the plaintiff as to the conjunctive claim of the court below, 82,500,000 won and damages for delay.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. According to the reasoning of the judgment below as to the grounds of appeal Nos. 1 through 4, the court below decided that D (hereinafter referred to as "D") shall purchase 3,300,000 won per external singing-to-door sing-to-door sing-out-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-out sing-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs-outs.

It cannot be deemed that it merely means that D is liable for an intentional and intentional act, and that D’s act of attracting investment is revealed to be unlawful and that the Defendant expressed his intent to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages together with D, and that the Defendant committed a tort against D’s Plaintiff.