logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.07.13 2018고정50
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, and F each fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant G, and I each fine of KRW 700,000,000, Defendant H, and J.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the president of the N, Defendant B is the president of the above N, Defendant C is the regular director of the Daejeon branch of the above N, and Defendant D is the 2 deputy head of the above N.

The above N entered into an apartment construction contract with P Co., Ltd. on April 20, 2015 and changed the construction cost dispute between P Co., Ltd. and P Co., Ltd. during the construction of Q apartment at the time of Seosan to the above N Co., Ltd., and the above Defendants did not settle the construction cost and carried out subcontracted construction at the construction site on the ground that the above Defendants did not settle the construction cost.

Defendant F, Defendant K, Defendant G, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant J and U, V, W, X, Y, Z, Z, Z, and AA mobilized as Defendant E, T, and security guards. They were willing to occupy the above apartment construction site.

1. The Defendants’ joint crimes and S, T, U,V, W, X, Y, Z, and AA shared with the Defendants, and around August 31, 2017, the victim RR Co., Ltd. entered the said Q apartment site in front of the construction site, and did not dispute the fact that the Defendants entered the construction site, and thus, the Defendants did not dispute the fact that the Defendants entered the construction site by the steel-processed stairs on the back of the building, thereby recognizing the content of the evidence ex officio to the extent that there is no substantial disadvantage to the Defendants’ defense.

After intrusion into the construction site, all entrance doors were locked, and the subcontractor, etc. who concluded a subcontract with AB and the damaged company, the security guards belonging to the victim company, could not enter the construction site.

Accordingly, Defendants, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, and AA jointly intruded on a structure, and interfered with the work of the victim company by force.

2. The date and time set forth in paragraph A(1) of the joint crime committed by Defendant A, Defendant E, and Defendant F, and CCTV managed by the said victim company at the same place for crime prevention.

arrow