beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendants are those who are employed by H that operates G and are ordered to enter into, and occupy, the J in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group I, and the K's L apartment.
1. On August 2014, the Defendants: (a) received a request from H for the invitation of guards from the lower court to the lower court on the part of the Defendant’s place of residence located in the Hanam Budget Unit from August 21, 2014; and (b) collected at the lower court’s office located in the Hanam Budget Unit from August 21, 2014 to August 09:0; (c) did not enter the apartment site with P, Q, R, L, other services personnel of H, M and the said G, as well as C, T, U,V,W, X, and Y, around 14:00 on the same day; (d) attempted to enter the apartment site through the wall on the side of the said apartment site and the front part of the said apartment site, and (e) attempted to enter the Z; (e) attempted to wear the Y’s wall installed in the wall on the side of the said apartment site; and (e) attempted to occupy the victim, the victim’s Da, and other services.
As a result, the Defendants attempted to intrude on the above apartment that is a building in collaboration with H, M, P, AF, R, S, T, U,V, W, X, and Y, but attempted.
2. On August 22, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendants received instructions from H to enter the above apartment through a door and fence on the instant apartment from H, AG, AH, T, T, U, V, W, X, and Y, and the Defendants attempted to enter the said apartment with the services sources, such as AG, AH, T, U, V,W, W, X, andY, together with the services sources of AG, AH, T, T, U, V,W, and Y, and S and AG used to wear AE, door, gar, make, etc., and upon putting AG on the steel network installed at the wall, the rest of the services costs on the wall installed in the wall, which were in possession of the victim J and AB beyond the steel network, and did not have been in effect through the wall fence, AE, AB, etc.
As a result, Defendants H. M.