beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2] On July 12, 200, the Defendant was subject to a juvenile protection disposition as a special larceny at the Cheongju District District Public Prosecutor's Office. On September 5, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for larceny, etc. on September 5, 2003. On June 26, 2009, the Cheongju District Public Prosecutor's Office issued a summary order of two million won for larceny. On July 14, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Cheongju District Public Prosecutor's Office and completed the execution of the sentence on April 24, 2012.
[2016 order 1278]
1. Habitual theft;
A. On August 31, 2013, at around 08:00, the Defendant: (a) placed a 103-lane of public rental housing in front of the 43-gil-do, Mansan-gun, Mansan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) placed a 2-lane of the Dapoter that the victim C parked and opened into the Dopoter; and (c) cut off with one head of the new bank head and one e-mail card that the victim was in custody of the Dapoter-gun, the head of the Saemaeul-gun, and one cash bank head; and (d) cut off the market value due to the following:
In addition, from August 2013 to June 13, 2016, the Defendant stolen the assets owned by the victims worth approximately KRW 4,767,000 in total over 16 times, as stated in the list of crimes in the attached crime committed.
B. On August 31, 2013, around 09:40, the Defendant: (a) stored the number of a new bank check in the name of the victim established at a new bank heading point in the Dong-gun, Mansan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) stored it in a cash payment season; and (c) deducted a password prior to identification; and (d) withdrawn a total of KRW 1,590,000 on two occasions, and stolen it.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property.
2. The name of the injured party when purchasing precious metal from a room in a room in which the non-fluence of the trade name in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, equivalent to the Cheongju on August 8, 2013 is inconsistent with the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit.