All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the assertion of unfair sentencing by both parties) that the court below rendered (the imprisonment of one year and two months, the suspension of execution of three years, the probation, and the collection of 38 million won) is too heavy or unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case introduced the defendant to the person who intends to operate the illegal game room and the person who intends to invest in it, and it was easy for him to inform them of control information in advance, and it was given a total of 38 million won under the pretext of soliciting affairs handled by the public officials, and there are disadvantageous factors for sentencing, such as the fact that the crime of this case is very poor, and the defendant has been punished due to the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act in the past.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant appears to have recognized each of the crimes in this case; (b) the Defendant returned all the funds received in relation to the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act; and (c) and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and contents of the crime; and (d) the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.