All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the defendant is too uncompared and unfair against the summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment with prison labor, two years of suspended execution, and confiscation) of the lower court, while the prosecutor appealeding that it is too uncompared and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s illegal business period exceeds one year and six months, and the game room’s size is so large that it is not good that the Defendant’s illegal business period is more than one year and six months.

On the other hand, the defendant is against the crime, and the certificate of keeping points was issued, so that he can use the game machine by recovering it again, so it does not seem to have promoted speculation significantly, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after crimes, etc. and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s allegation of unfair sentencing is difficult

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.