1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “The appeal by the Defendants against this case on April 29, 2015 and the appeal by the Prosecutor against the Defendants is all dismissed (No. 2014No1099),” “The Plaintiff’s appeal against this case was dismissed on March 26, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 2014Meu5454),” and “The Plaintiff’s appeal against this case was dismissed on March 26, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 2014Meu554),” and “The appeal by G on March 12, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 201Meu5164),” and “The appeal by the Defendants on March 12, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 2014Meu5164)” are additionally stated in the main sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the lower court and the lower court rejected the judgment as to each of the Defendants alleged the lack of additional evidence from the first instance judgment and the second judgment.

2. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants’ act of this case against the Defendants without paying the compensation liability based on the final and conclusive judgment against Defendant B constitutes an act that does not violate the social rules, and thus, the Defendants’ act constitutes an act that does not violate the said social rules. However, the Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff’s filing of the lawsuit against the Defendants is aimed at bullying and thus, it cannot be allowed to abuse the right of lawsuit in violation of the principle of good faith.

However, the Defendants were convicted of the conduct of interference with business on May 19, 2012. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal (appeal based on the grounds of two-dimensionalness) was dismissed, and the aforementioned conviction became final and conclusive as it is. In light of these facts, the circumstance alone asserted by the Defendants is by the Defendants.