1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff A KRW 14,05,462, KRW 5,027,98, and each of them from July 12, 2017.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: C development project approval and public notice - project name: D public notice of Kimhae on July 29, 2010: the E public notice of Kimhae on December 29, 2010; the F public notice of Kimhae on September 27, 2012; G public notice of Kimhae on October 17, 2013; H public notice of Kimhae on November 21, 2013; I public notice of Kimhae-project operator on January 14, 2016; the Defendant:

B. Adjudication on expropriation - Subject to expropriation (see the details of compensation described in attached Form 1): J (which was part of K in the past, but is registered in installments on November 10, 2010) in 1,675 square meters and 332/1064 square meters of L, 981 square meters and 732/100 of the above L, owned by Plaintiff B (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) - The date of expropriation commencement: June 20, 2016 - Compensation for losses: 730,970,000 won for the above J land and 32/100 of the above L, 140,607,720 (the compensation for losses against Plaintiff A shall be the sum of the above compensation for losses, 871,5727,740,720 won and the above compensation for losses) in relation to the above L, 207,720 won and 332/1064 of the above L,7136,727

C. This ruling - The plaintiffs raised an objection claiming an increase in compensation for the land of this case, but dismissed.

D. Court Appraisal - The appraisal of the above J land - The appraisal of the appraisal value of the above J land at above 730,970,00 won at above 742,695,00 won, the appraisal value of the above LJ land at above 332/10 of 1064 from above 140,60,607,720 won to above 142,888,182 won, the appraisal value of 732/1064 from above 310,014,620 won to above 315,042,618 won (the appraisal value of the above J land at above 457,930,80 won in total), shall be calculated [founded grounds] Gap's evidence 1, 3, 5, 6 (including each number), Eul's evidence 1, 200 won, the result of appraisal of appraiser M in this court, the purport of the entire appraisal and evaluation as a whole.

2. Attached Form 2 of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows;

3. The assertion and judgment

A. 1 The Plaintiffs did not provide all landowners with information on the progress of the instant project and related procedures, and did not proceed with the determination as to whether procedural errors were found.