logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단2791
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2016, around 03:35, the Defendant: (a) went to the Defendant’s house and entered the Defendant’s house under the influence of alcohol for more than 302; (b) the police box of the Jeju Police Station D, which was dispatched upon receipt of the 112 report, was carried out by the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant was in front of the front of the 502 front of the 502 front of the said apartment house; and (d) the Defendant was in front of the front of the 502 front of the 502 front of the said 502 front of the 11st century.

E. E. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. f. f. f. f. f. f.

The 112 police officers interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the dispatch duty of the 112 report by taking three times the chests of the above E as head and assaulting them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographed materials;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [Scope of Recommendation] The mitigated area (i.e., the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) [i.e., January to August] (i., a special mitigated person] the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of public duties in the area of mitigation (i.e., the decision of sentence]. In particular, the various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case should be considered in consideration of the following circumstances: Considering the favorable circumstances: (i) reflects: (ii) the first one; (iii) the first one; (iv) the degree of exercise of tangible power; (v) the degree of exercise of tangible power; (v) the fact that money was deposited in the future of the police officer E; (v) the fact that money was deposited in the future;

arrow