A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 20:00 on October 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, the Defendant and the Victim F, while holding a meeting of the fraternity where the Defendant and the Victim F, were affiliated with the husband of the Defendant and the Victim; (b) the Defendant and F, in turn, have a dispute over the extension money; and (c) the victim, who caused the Defendant to bring the defect to the victim’s chest, caused the Defendant to avoid disturbance, such as taking the head of the defect to the victim’s chest, and taking the victim’s chest at the restaurant, thereby obstructing other customers from entering the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in Paragraph 1, expressed that “I am out of one panty,” and “I am out of the panty G, H, etc. I am out of the place where I am in the said place. I am out of the panty. I am lele in this year, I am am lehy, and I am am lehy, I am this year? I am amhy. I am amhy, I amh. I am amhy. I do not amhh.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made D or G in the second trial records;

1. Statement made in F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and groups of groups;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 314 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act [the aggregate of the amounts of concurrent crimes as provided for in the crime of interference with business heavier than the punishment];

3. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

5. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs

1. Although the Defendant was at the time and place as indicated in the judgment, he did not interfere with duties or insult the victim unilaterally by the victim, even though he was at the time and place as indicated in the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by each of the above evidence, we examine the judgment.