Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C (n, 22 years of age) are between the school restrictions from March 2013 to November 6, 2013.

On November 6, 2013, at around 03:10 on November 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while speaking for the victim with respect to the receipt of letters from the Earbane in front of the “E” located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Defendant saw the victim as her hand and her ket with the victim’s head, leading the victim's head.

When the victim's head, etc., the defendant continued to dump the victim's head, etc. and used it.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the impairment of the head of the part requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Partial statement of C in the third protocol of trial;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of assault committed by a defendant cannot be deemed to be less than that of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, but the defendant's primary offender is determined as ordered by taking into account all the circumstances recorded in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances and circumstances after the crime, etc.

(The sentencing criteria shall not apply because of the choice of fine penalty).

1. The summary of the facts charged lies in the victim's house located in Daejeon Seo-gu 204, Seo-gu, Daejeon by using the gap between the police officer and the police officer who received a report and sent the victim after committing the same act as the facts charged in the judgment.

The Defendant, around 05:00 on November 6, 2013, returned to the victim’s home, but the Defendant opened a door as soon as possible to her fly fly fly, who did not attend the door.”