The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below takes into account the fact that the defendant led to the confession of and reflects on the crime of this case, the defendant's health condition is not good. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good custom by commercializing women's sex, and it is in need of a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture. The defendant has been punished three times by a fine from January 201, and has been sentenced three times to a suspended sentence of imprisonment. Among them, the last three times of the crime of this case was punished by operating sexual traffic establishments in the same name as the crime of this case, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the crime of this case before the crime of this case, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case more than two months, and the defendant was investigated as a business owner after the occurrence of the crime of this case, and the defendant did not accept the defendant's overall examination of the defendant's age conditions for sentencing.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.