logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.23 2016고정393
채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant received a loan from C to the obligor D, and E is in the position of interested parties under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as the wife of D.

Defendant’s cell phone from February 10, 2015 to March 4, 2015, “D frauds have been changed” as E’s cell phone from February 10, 2015, and needs to be the thickness now.

written correspondence shall be subject to the “Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man

at any time, fraud may be caused; or

He sent text messages containing the contents of "I amba" and "I ambath" and "I ambath" to E on April 6, 2015 because I ambath cannot understand them by using a third person rolling words, etc., such as actions to not pay the amount of the above case, although you are jointly and severally liable with D to pay the amount of the above case, and even if you are liable to pay the amount of the above case, I ambath, etc.

1. The sending of a written notice to the effect that the notice

In relation to the debt, the article has reached the interested parties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of a written notice or text message statute;

1. Article 15 (3) 1 of the Act on the Fair Debt Collection Practices and Articles 15 and 8-3 (1) (excluding punishment) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow