The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the suspended sentence of KRW 1.5 million) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination; and (b) there are various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment seems unfair. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 15(2)2, Article 9 subparag. 3 and 6, Article 15(3)1, and Article 8-3(1) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act on the ground that the part of the judgment of the court below on the “1........’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’s appeal is dismissed under Articles 15(2)2, 9 subparag. 3 and 6, and Articles 15(3)1, and 8-3(1) of the Act on the Fair Debt Collection of Claims under the relevant provisions of the Act on the ground that the case is subject to Articles 15(2)2 and 15(2)6, and Article 15(3)1 and 8-3(1) of the same Act.

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Inasmuch as it is obvious that each of the options to choose a sentence is a clerical error, it shall be corrected to add ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.