logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고단608
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public official of Grade VI in administration, who works as the team leader of the G-Gun Park in the facilities facility of the former North F-Gun Office, and is retired from the construction of the G-Gun complex in actual management and supervision. Defendant B is a person who has completed the construction on October 16, 2015 after being awarded a contract for the replacement of F-Gun G Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

Defendant

At around September 2015, A found in the above I office and gathered that Defendant B obtained an estimate of KRW 12 million from Defendant B, stating that “The amount of construction work would be increased to KRW 18 million, and the difference of KRW 6 million, excluding the actual construction cost, would vary to Na,” and Defendant B would like to obtain an estimate of KRW 12 million from Defendant B by promising to deliver the difference of KRW 6 million immediately after receiving the above additional construction cost in return for receiving the orders.

Defendant A entered into a contract for the replacement with Defendant B on October 22 of the same month, and had Defendant B carry out the replacement work. Upon completion of the work on October 16 of the same year, Defendant A entered 136 of the same year as the supervisor of the construction work who entered into the supervision report and entered the actual replacement report, and submitted a false protocol of supervision to the FF military facility park business office by stating as if the stability was removed even if the stability was not removed. Defendant B submitted a written claim to the FF facility park office for requesting construction cost of KRW 18 million on October 23 of the same year, and Defendant B submitted a written claim to the FF facility park office for requesting construction cost of KRW 18 million. A public official of Grade 7 in charge of payment of construction cost, who falsely recognized that the construction cost was completed without any problem, was a public official of Grade 7 in charge of payment of construction cost, who was aware that the construction cost was completed, as a result of the construction work.

arrow