beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fine of 8,00,000 won, Defendant B of 2,000,000 won, Defendant C of 8,000,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[2013 Highest 26]
1. Defendant A, while working as a public official from around December 2010 to January 2012, 201, was a responsible manager in charge of H ecosystem restoration project and a field supervisor in charge of the construction site of the project in 2011, while working as a public official in Kim Jong-si G, and was in charge of preparing a report on the results so that the construction business operator who requested design change and changed design can receive additional construction expenses from the construction site operator.
The Kim Jong-si promoted the "H ecosystem restoration project" in 201 to restore H's eco-tourism exploration paths in H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H located in the city of Kim Jong-si, and the JJ was selected as a construction business operator around May 3, 201 with the construction cost of KRW 441,124,30 for the above construction work. B, the representative director of the above business, was awarded the above construction work again to C, and therefore, the above construction work was actually carried out as the "field director" at the above construction site.
The Defendant continued to request the above C to modify the construction site from May 201 to December 2, 2011.
In such a situation, around June 17, 201, the Defendant received a request from C to the effect that “it would be possible to receive to the maximum amount of additional construction expenses in relation to design modification” from C within a vehicle parked behind LH government office, and the Defendant received a cash of KRW 2 million in the name of the honorarium for the design modification from the above C until September 7, 201, and received a request from the above C to the effect that “it would be possible to receive the maximum amount of additional construction expenses in relation to the design modification,” and received a total of KRW 4 million in total on three occasions in the name of the case, as described in the attached list of crimes, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from the above C, as well as a request to the above purport, by September 7, 2011.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.
2. Defendant B. The Defendant