logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.22 2019고합467
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 13, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (sexual purchase, etc.) introduced the victim D (n, 12 years of age, 12 years of age) who introduced himself/herself as a minor under 14 years of age through the mobile phone hosting c, in a guest room where the number of people in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Bn't know is unknown, as the price for sexual traffic, at the intervals of KRW 120,000,000 as the price for sexual traffic, and exceeded the block and clothes of the said victim, cut off the blick and flock of the victim, and prompt the victim into the chest and flock of the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and stated in paragraph (1) that “10 times” was written in several indictments by using a gallon function of a cellular phone 4 mobile phones owned by the Defendant, where the victim’s sexual organ is omitted, and that “10 times” was written in several indictments by the victim’s body, etc. However, in the cellular phone 4, the Defendant’s photo, such as the victim’s body, etc. was found about 10 copies (Evidence record 477-497 pages), and the file name appears to be “Screrehot” as a photograph taken by the Defendant to capture the video taken by the Defendant (Evidence record 576 pages of evidence record), so that the number of pictures taken by the Defendant could not be specified in detail, and thus, part of the facts charged was revised without going through the amendment

Photographs was taken.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using the camera or other similar devices.

3. On April 9, 2019, the Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media) and the victim’s Internet site E.

arrow