(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단3310

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단3310

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 20, 2018, the Defendant, who is engaged in Cstststa taxi driving, driven the above taxi around 05:10 on March 20, 2018, was driving along five lanes in the direction of the southwest of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, along the direction of the new distance.

At the front of the road, there is an intersection equipped with a vehicle signal apparatus and a crosswalk installed with a pedestrian signal apparatus, so that there is a victim E and the victim F (the age of 28) who was in his/her possession of the taxi driver, confirmed whether there is a person engaging in driving of the motor vehicle, and had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle in a safe manner, despite the fact that there is an occupational duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle in a safe manner, and by negligence in violation of the signal, the driver neglected it, and led the victim E (the age of 30) who walked the crosswalk along with the right edge of the taxi driver's seat and the victim E and the victim F (the age of 28) who was in his/her possession.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim E, such as the upper left-hand body felball, which requires treatment for about three months, and the victim F, the injury to the victim E, such as salt, tension, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (Confession, agreement, record of crimes, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2018.10.24 2018고단6391

-울산지방법원 2016.07.19 2016고단1756

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.19 2018고단1183

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고단2748

-광주지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고정859