1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Facts of recognition

The defendant is a company operating air transport business.

On July 18, 1988, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant and served as a guest room manager via cabin crew.

The plaintiff No. 6, when the head of the guest room office worked as the head of the guest room team, the plaintiff made the following remarks to female crew members including contract-based crew members.

(hereinafter “In this case’s misconduct”). In 2008, female crew members, who did not bring in the swimming uniform at the time of their flight, stated that “n't need any swimming uniform.” The body replaced the inside for the purpose of the internal service, and the body replaced with the boarding passenger’s crypters, and the body attached the boarding passenger’s crypter with it.”

From No. 54 No. 54 No. 2009, M’s crew referred to as “a man-friendly male-gu will be good.”

He called that the FF crew in 52, Nos. 53, 201, called “Iskn't have been able to get head and sleep back from the room when leaving a model for the Ashresh.”

G crew in the period of 27, 29, 51, 56 Nos. 27, 29, 56, and 201, saying, “The low-income person does not have a long sense of male massage.”

The Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nos. 30 and 49, and H crew and arms were faced in 2011, and H crew called “I” with the name of “I” for H crew members.

On July 21, 2012, evidence Nos. 28, 2012, C, and C, the team members and D’s crew’s Kakaoooom photographs among the group members and meals, and “Ilon Seoul model. The same is also blishing.”

The testimony of the 15, 22, 24, 25 evidence, the first instance court witness D, K, AE, and the first instance court witness AF stated, in 2012, K crew "K is against the maintenance company and the subordinate male."

을 제15, 16, 23, 24호증, 제1심증인 D, K, AE, 당심증인 AG의 각 증언 2012년 L 승무원에 대해 다른 승무원들에게 “쟤 옷 입는 것 봐봐. 나가요 같아”,"술집 여자같이 남자한테 가방...