A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2012, the election of the 19th National Assembly member carried out on April 11, 2012. C Party held the intra-party competition to recommend proportional representative candidates from March 14, 2012 to March 18, 2012. At that time C Party grants the right to vote to the person who has joined the election for the intra-party competition at least once for six months before the public announcement date of the election for the intra-party competition, and the elector selected the candidates on the list for the general female disabled at least once, ② once in the pro-con method, five candidates listed on the list for the open-party candidate, ③ five candidates listed on the list for the open-party candidate list, ④ one time in the pro-con method, and the on-site voting method and the online voting method, and divided into two voting methods.

However, online voting is carried out in a way that the elector who connects to the C-party Internet Electronic Voting System (F) enters the certification number sent to a mobile phone registered in the party member registry into the system, and the elector directly enters the certification number transmitted to his/her own mobile phone, and then selects proportional representation he/she supports. However, the Defendant was willing to cast his/her vote for G by finding out the certification number sent to his/her mobile phone in order to enhance the possibility of election of the G elected to the candidate for proportional representation.

On March 18, 2012, the Defendant sent the certification number sent to him/her to the elector in contact with I and instead of online voting, and then sent the certification number to him/her in the name of I using the certification number received from I and cast his/her vote to G. From March 14, 2012 to March 18, 2012, the Defendant connected the above system to the above system and cast his/her vote to G, such as by the J et al., as shown in the list of crimes.