beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fine of 1,00,000 won, Defendant B of 300,000 won, Defendant C of 300,000 won, Defendant C of 30,000 won, and Defendant of .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 11, 2012, the instant crime took place on April 11, 2012, and G party run a party competition to recommend candidates for proportional representation from March 14, 2012 to March 18, 2012.
In a specific way, G Party: (a) admitted up to February 23, 2012 and admitted up at least one time on the one hand to the person who paid the party membership fee for six months prior to the date of the public announcement of the presidential election in △△ Party, and (b) granted the right to vote for the candidate entered in the candidate list for the general female disabled at △△△ Party, and (c) granted the right to vote for the candidate for △△△ Party (H 1), once voting in the form of pros and cons, five times in the form of pros and cons, and one time in the form of pros and cons, and eight times in the form of pros and cons for the candidate list of △△△ Party open-type.
In allocating proportional representation numbers according to the voting result (for example, the number of women in general women and disabled persons, number of men in men, number of disabled persons, number 7 for young people, number 3 for young candidates, number 4, 5, 6, 14, and 18 for open candidates, and number 20 for strategic candidates shall be elected each at 12 times.
On the other hand, G party divided the proportional representation lines into on-site voting and online voting, and in the case of online voting, the elector connected to the Internet Electronic Voting System (J) was entering the certification number sent to the mobile phone registered on the roster of party members into the system and participating in voting.
2. On March 14, 2012, Defendant A, who interfered with the intraparty competition activities of Defendant A and B Party G, contacted Defendant B, the electors of the 19th National Assembly election of proportional representative candidates for proportional representative candidates for the said G G party, to act on behalf of Defendant B for the online vote. As such, Defendant B’s cell phone transmission number was notified to himself.
Accordingly, Defendant B immediately delivered to Defendant A a certification number which was transmitted to his mobile phone.
immediately after that.