1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 2,747,149 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from June 11, 2013 to October 28, 2014.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On March 29, 2009, the facts of recognition (1) as the basis of responsibility (A) B driving a CA car owned by it (hereinafter “accidented vehicle”) around 15:00 on March 29, 200, and driving a two-lane between D Apartment 4 and 5 complexes in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and driving a two-lane between the two-lanes, while changing the two-lane into one-lane for Uton, the Defendant’s driver, who was driving in the middle of the two-lanes.

(B) On September 30, 2009, immediately after the instant accident, the Defendant was diagnosed as E on September 30, 2009, as “the instant accident was diagnosed as having undergone a diagnosis, and thereafter, complained of the pain and knife of the side part of the side part of the set-off hospital, to have the knife of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part, to have the knife of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part, to have the knife of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, to have the knife and inner part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, to have the upper part of the upper part of the knife, to have the knife of the right,

Accordingly, on July 16, 2010 at a set-off hospital, the Defendant was subject to the implementation of the Matrine pathism and the Matrine pathism respectively on December 17, 2010 and May 14, 2012, respectively.

(C) The Plaintiff is an insurer of the comprehensive automobile insurance contract for an accident vehicle.

(2) The summary of the result of physical examination (out-of-the-counter department) is that the Defendant’s symptoms, freshitis, fresh fever, and panchitis, among symptoms diagnosed at a countervailing hospital, were caused by spathrosis, and it is determined that the inner side spathr damage and the hydrograde spathrosis was caused by the instant accident. While the causal link between the spathrosis movement and the spathrosis of the spathropical spathropical spathrosis, the degree of contribution to the said accident is about 30%, and the remainder is caused by spathrosis.

(3) Comprehensively taking into account the facts recognized as above and the results of physical appraisal commission, the Plaintiff’s comprehensive automobile insurance contract concerning the accident vehicle.