The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On March 31, 2016, at the front of the D convenience store located in Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon on March 31, 2016, the Defendant discovered that there is a mixed victim E (n, 18 years of age) who is an employee, and the victim Da Da Da Da n.

I see that it is driving away from the house.

The term “the victim” and “the victim was shouldered by hand.”

Accordingly, the victim intends to enter the convenience store, and the defendant enters the convenience store according to the victim, and then die to the victim.

The term “the victim” and “the victim shall be able to catch the victim and the victim shall be able to unfold the visibility with the victim who was frightened to the inside of the convenience point, and shall be frightened by the same flag as “the victim shall be frightened,” and “the victim shall be frightened.”

".............. the victim shall be injured, and the victim shall not be dead and discarded.

“The victim was frightened by having the victim drinked.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Judgment

The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 283(3) of the same Act. According to the re-written agreement submitted to this court on May 11, 2016, the victim may be aware of the fact that the victim has withdrawn his/her intent to punish the Defendant after the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and is so decided as per Disposition.