1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 30, 2014, the deceased B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was hospitalized in the Insurance Contract with the Insurance Contract, which was operated by the Defendant, and was under medical treatment.

On July 3, 2014, the Deceased transferred to the Ansan Hospital of the Korea National Institute of Medical Services due to the aggravation of his/her state due to high blood transfusion, etc., but died by the arcia of Ambassador on the same day.

B. The Plaintiff (designated parties, hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and the designated parties are children of the Deceased.

[Grounds for recognition] The items of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was: (a) the Deceased was diagnosed with urology in 2001 and was hospitalized at the instant hospital, and continuously needed blood control; (b) the Defendant did not conduct the periodic blood examination for the Deceased and the treatment for blood pressure control; and (c) neglected the Deceased’s examination and treatment for the disease caused by infection.

As a result, the deceased died due to the urology and a parosis caused by urology.

In addition, the defendant delayed the measures to transfer the deceased to another hospital as the condition of the deceased rapidly falls.

Therefore, the defendant shall compensate the plaintiff and the selected parties for damages each of them amounting to KRW 23,33,332 [=1,66,666 of the deceased's funeral expenses amounting to KRW 5,000,000/3, less than KRW 23,332, each of them (hereinafter the same shall apply].

) Each of the 16,66,666 won (the 50,000,000 won/3 of the deceased) and damages for delay shall be liable to pay 5,00,000 won for consolation money and damages for delay.

3. According to the results of the examination of medical records on Gap's 6 and 7, the following circumstances are acknowledged.

In other words, the deceased was old at the time, and was suffering from cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, such as urine and mathic disease. However, from the hospitalization of the hospital of this case to June 2014, the deceased was in a state that he was not bad, and the defendant is periodically in a blood hospital of the deceased.