logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.04.28 2015고단81
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of CYF stations or other automobiles.

On October 15, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 15:15, and proceeded bypassing the three distance in front of the Haak-gu, Haak-gun, Haak-gun, Sinnam-gun, to the area of the Haak-gu Office of Mountain Indonesion.

Since a place is an intersection where traffic is not controlled, a driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle along the lane prior to entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the steering gear, and avoided the steering gear, while driving the e-learning vehicle at the direction of the e-mail, the Defendant failed to find out that the e-learning vehicle was driven from the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and stopped. As part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving seat, the Defendant failed to immediately stop the e-learning vehicle and escape without taking necessary measures, even though it damages the e-learning vehicle that is owned by the F so that the 889,898 won of the repair cost can be seen as 889,898 won.

2. On 16:01 on the same day as paragraph (1), the Defendant was required to comply with the breath alcohol test by the Defendant at the Hashean Police Station located in the Hashean-gun, Hashean-gun, G, for the following reasons: (a) on the grounds that there exist reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant had driven a CYF Laol vehicle under the influence of alcohol, with a brealy smelling, without a clear distance; and (b) he was required by the assistant I affiliated with the above police box to comply with the breath alcohol test by all 16:43 times from that time; and (c) he was required to comply with the breath alcohol test by all 16:43.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above without good cause.

arrow