(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고정808

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고정808

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the support team for the operation of the branch office of the D, and the victim E shall be the victim E.

1. On March 23, 2014, the Defendant, using the internal computer network used by D employees around 11:16, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by revealing publicly false information through an information and communications network with the intent of disturbing the victim by transmitting the e-mail with the content that the victim did not promise various benefits to union members at the time of the election of the president of the association, and that the victim did not have any situation to satisf, due to such an undertaking, “( Strategy)” was committed by each individual at the time of the election of the association at the expiration of the e-mail, “F, etc., and pressure E, is the same.”

2. The Defendant, on April 16, 2014, using the internal computer network used by D employees around April 14:36, 201, did not have received rebates equivalent to KRW 2.760,00 from the victim while changing the welfare card company.

1. In the event of the change of the welfare card company, the e-mail sent to seven persons, including F, etc., who are D employees, for the purpose of slandering the victim by transmitting the e-mail of the rebates (2.760,000 won) received at the time of the change of the welfare card company, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by revealing publicly false facts through the information and communications network. 3. On June 29, 2015, the Defendant used the internal computer network used by D employees, which was used by D employees, for the purpose of slandering the victim. Although there was no fact that the victim had threatened the victim to kill the Defendant, the Defendant did not have threatened the victim to murder, along with the photograph of the Kakao Kakao Kao Kao Stockholm,

"In this article, the victim's reputation was damaged by exposing false information openly through information and communications networks with an intention to defame the victim by posting a statement of contents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.06.30 2014고단2729

-서울남부지방법원 2013.6.25.선고 2013고단1450 판결

-창원지방법원 2020.12.03 2020고합234

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.01.21 2019고정891

-대구지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단2641