The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant repents and reflects his mistake, that there is no particular record of punishment prior to each of the crimes in this case, and that the defendant wishes to resume.

The fact that it appears is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant, without any special reason, injured the victim and absent from work as a social service personnel for 12 days without permission, and the nature of the crime is not that of the crime and the degree of injury of the victim is that the degree of injury of the victim is light.

In addition to the partial repayment of the victim's medical expenses, the damage recovery was not made in full, and the victim wants to punish the defendant is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, and there is no special change in circumstances that may be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the lower court up to the heart.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.