The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects his mistake, the person who uses in the same Article in a private document does not want the punishment of the defendant as the defendant's will, and the damage amount of the crime of fraud is relatively minor.

It appears that it is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, the defendant leased a vehicle by stealing another person's name after the control by unauthorized License, caused a traffic accident while driving another person's license, and acquired another person's credit card and used it for four times. The fact that the nature of the crime is not good, the degree of injury to the victim of the traffic accident is not weak, but the damage has not been recovered until now, and the fact that the victim's credit card was used for the victim's M without permission and did not recover any particular damage to the above victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, considering the fact that there is no special change in circumstances that may be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the lower court until the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.