The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each punishment (a fine of three million won is imposed on the Defendants) declared by the court below to the Defendants.

2. The judgment of the court below is found to have not affected the conclusion of the defendant's case of injury to D, but it is necessary to strictly punish the defendants as serious crimes that interfere with the trial of the court for the discovery of substantial truth, causing confusion and incompetence in the judicial action of the State. Defendant B, who was sentenced to six months by the Gwangju District Court on August 6, 2010 and was sentenced to the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 30, 201, committed the crime of this case on the condition that the execution of the sentence was completed on November 30, 201 and committed the crime of this case even during the repeated period. In addition, Defendant B had the records of suspended sentence once for the crime of this case, six times for the crime of this case, suspension of sentence two times for the defendant A, suspension of sentence two times for the defendant, and fine two times for the crime of this case, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendants, and there is no change in the circumstances after the judgment of the court below.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so, and it is so decided as per Disposition.