The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (one million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized as a favorable circumstance such as: (a) the Defendant’s deep reflects on the instant crime; (b) the Defendant alleged that he was injured; (c) the Defendant did not receive an agreement amounting to KRW 2 million; and (d) the Defendant did not refuse to receive proper treatment; and thus, (c) the Defendant did not necessarily have been punished for the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s perjury was not punished for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, notwithstanding the Defendant’s perjury; (c) the Defendant supported a mother who has a disability due to brain color, etc.; and (d) the Defendant did not have any criminal record exceeding the previous or fine.

However, it is necessary to respect the judgment of the court below because there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the court below because new sentencing data have not been submitted at the trial court. Perjury is a serious crime that interferes with the deliberation of the court for the discovery of substantial truth and thus causes confusion and uncertainty in the judicial action of the State. If the defendant's perjury is not revealed, the foreigner's driver is sentenced to a maximum fine, and the extension of sojourn in the examination for permission for extension of sojourn was denied and suffers disadvantages in leaving the Republic of Korea due to non-permission. In addition, considering the following circumstances and result of the crime of this case, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.