beta
Text
The defendant is based on the restoration of the true name with respect to the land size of 105 square meters in the wife population D when it is allowed to the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The land survey book prepared by the land survey station in light of around 1915 (4 years in 1915) is written as the “G Ri (G Tong)” as to the land of the Gyeonggi-do-gun E (F once) 2,432 (hereinafter “instant situation land”).
B. Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun G Ri (G Tong) changed its affiliation and name to Hri-gun, Gyeonggi-do around 1914. At the time of the investigation into the land of this case, the report on the land of this case was filed on January 6, 1912 (G Dong 45 years).
(c)
On January 20, 1964, the registration of change in the name of the owner was completed on the ground of change in the name and registration number on September 13, 1999, No. 8985-4-5 on March 1, 1996, since the ownership in the name of Suwon-gun, which was due to the ownership of the right on October 1, 196, was changed to the name of the owner as the defendant on the ground of change in the name and registration number.
Since then, on December 5, 2013, the land was divided into 105 square meters of forest land D with the wife population in Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”) on December 5, 2013 (hereinafter “the registration of the transfer of ownership in this case’s land”) in the Defendant’s name, which was completed on the ground of reversion of rights. 【The ground for recognition” 【Nos. 1 through 4, and 10 through 13 (including a variety number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul’s each entry in the evidence Nos. 1, 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.
2. Determination on the defense prior to the merits
A. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion falls under “Gi (Gi) Ri,” a non-corporate association consisting of residents living in H-ri, the Plaintiff himself/herself, and is a non-corporate association consisting of residents living in H-ri, and is located in the land research register as to the land of this case. Thus, the Defendant recovered the land of this case, which is divided from the land of this case, from the land of this case, to the Plaintiff as a genuine owner.