logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.03.16 2016고단18
협박
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged and the victim B both of the Defendant and the victim B are subject to forced indecent conduct from the Defendant, and the victim was forced to leave the Defendant, and refused to leave, and submitted a written complaint to the Gyeongnam Development Police Station, but the result was not dealt with as the victim’s intent, but rather, the Defendant submitted the written complaint to the Gyeongnam Development Police Station as defamation against the victim.

A. On August 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) completed a police protocol due to a case of defamation filed by the Defendant at the parking lot of the Busan Police Station located in the Busan Police Station at around 16:00 on August 26, 2015; and (b) the Defendant was necessarily dead even if there was any difference between the Defendant and the Defendant and the Defendant’s death.

"The victim threatened the victim".

B. On September 17, 2015, the Defendant’s office at the Criminal Team office of the Gyeongnam-nam Police Station at around 11:20 on September 17, 2015, refers to the disclosure of the accused to the accused after the injured person completed a general record of an indecent act case filed against the Defendant.

b) a person who can sufficiently die at any time.

"The victim threatened the victim".

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Articles 283 (21) and (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. On February 12, 2016, the date of the instant indictment, the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant.

(c)

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow