Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on September 20, 208 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million on October 8, 2008 at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, which is a fine of KRW 1.5 million), driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on April 26, 2012 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 4 million on July 27, 2012), and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On September 26, 2018, the Defendant driven a D low-priced car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.146% from around 20 meters from the front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si B to the front road of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

As a result, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol more than twice, driven a motor vehicle again while under the influence of alcohol despite the power of driving a motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a summary order statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is that the defendant, who has been able to drive a second alcohol not less than twice, drives a second alcohol, not less than the nature of the crime, but less the amount of alcohol concentration in the blood due to the instant drinking

However, it appears that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and that the defendant was driving a relatively short distance to move, and there seems to be some circumstances to take into account the circumstances. Of the defendant's drinking driving power in 2008, the 10 years elapsed from the date of the crime of this case, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, and age of the defendant.