logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.18 2017고단1693
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on March 16, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of a fine of three million won on May 2, 2014) and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on February 16, 2017 (the issuance of a summary order of a fine of three million won on March 31, 2017) while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on February 16, 2017, and violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On March 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a D Kazon under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.176% during blood, without obtaining a driver’s license, from around 20:10 on the roads near the Young-gu B commercial building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to around 5km-si C, Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Voluntary accompanying reports, reports on the situation of driving at home, photographs at control sites, and the list of reported cases handled under 112;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a summary order statute;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Act on the Reduction of Small Quantity, which committed the crime of this case on two or more occasions, has a record of driving alcohol, and on May 6, 2014, the Defendant, whose driver’s license was revoked due to driving under drinking on the same day, is not less than that of the crime, but not less than that of the crime. The Defendant, even though he was discovered by driving without a license or driving under the influence of drinking around February 2017, was found to have driven without a license and driving under the influence of drinking, there is a little possibility of criticism in that the Defendant, even though he was found to have driven under the influence of driving without a license or driving under the influence of drinking, and the Defendant was absent on the

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake.

arrow