A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

A person who applies for a medical care and custody shall be punished.

Criminal facts

The facts underlying the reason for the medical care and custody [criminal facts] The defendant and the person in charge of the medical care and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") destroyed the property and caused public danger by setting fire on October 29, 2015 at the ctel rooftop in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, by piling up the trees and sweets, etc. and attaching them to them.

[Fact of the cause of the medical care and custody] The Defendant committed the above crime in a state that the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a stimulative disorder, religious net disorder, over-the-counter thinking, stimulious thinking, highly advanced climate, stimulative disorder, the difficulty in controlling impulses, and the decline in the real judgment power, and thus, committed the crime at the treatment and custody facilities, and there is a need to receive medical treatment at the treatment and custody facilities, and there is a risk of recidivism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement;

1. A copy of each work site and written estimate for construction works;

1. Photographs of each damaged scene, suspect's scene of crime, and other photographs;

1. Mental and physical weakness: A written opinion and a mental appraisal;

1. The need for the treatment of the case and the risk of recidivism: Each 112 report processing sheet, opinion, and a mental appraisal report [1] repeatedly commits a fire-fighting act prior to the instant case without any specific reason, such as incineration at a public place; ② as a result of the mental appraisal of the Defendant, the Defendant is judged to have a risk of repeating a crime without any special treatment due to the mental illness in the judgment; ③ continuous protection and treatment are necessary for the prevention of recurrence in the future; ③ the Defendant does not have an environment to receive appropriate treatment because he/she is married without his/her guardian; ④ the Defendant appears to have failed to fully recognize the seriousness of the risk of his/her mental illness; and ⑤ it appears that he/she himself/herself has no awareness of the seriousness of the risk of recidivism; and ⑤ it appears that he/she had no other guidance to prevent recidivism