Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2017, at around 03:15, the Defendant: (a) agreed on the attachment of E and Si guard, the main agent of the D police box around the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at the D police box; and (b) requested the police officer F to return home from the police officer F who belongs to the Seoul Maak Police Station D police box; and (c) demanded the F of the Party F to receive a long amount of money from the Party F to the Party F of the Party F;

F.C. Does f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

These dogs shall not be immediately able to work and receive money. They shall not be immediately able to drink.

“At the time of drinking police officer F’s chest at one time while taking a bath to “”.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV verification);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has a history of fine for the same kind of punishment in 2010 and the method of obstructing a police officer’s insulting speech or performance of official duties is not good. However, the degree of exercise of tangible power is not strong, and the defendant’s exercise of tangible power is a kind of exercise of force once again, by under the influence of alcohol on driving, leading the defendant a lar and driving home home, the defendant made a entire confession of the crime and divided his mistake, and the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered.