The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, from around April 8, 201 to April 12, 201, operated a DNA gas station in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) December 9, 2010; (c) December 15, 2010; (d) December 16, 2010; (e) December 18, 2010; (e) December 18, 2010; and (e) purchased at least 0% of the total number of customers from unspecified E to 60% at one time on January 8, 201; and (e) 10% of the total number of customers from 0% of the total number of customers and 10% of the total number of customers from 0% of the total number of customers and 10% of the total number of 0% of the zero-day light oil.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) Defendant’s assertion and statement E (1) has consistently asserted that the Defendant was provided with non-data transit, not through a similar transit from the investigative agency to the instant court.

② At the time of undergoing an investigation by an investigation agency, E, who manufactured and supplied similar transit, stated that, although he said that the oil supplied by himself was the same as that of similar transit, he did not speak to the operator of other gas stations.

(3) In light of the price presented, E did not request business registration or sampling with the knowledge that it is a similar light. However, the Defendant stated that he/she requested sampling differently (Investigation Records 1701 pages). The Defendant offered 80-90 won per liter than the market price when E first carries a storage product at the time of loading via light. At first, E was suspected of being in charge of smelling its samples, and it was found that it was supplied as non-data, but there was no error in finding it as being supplied through data and having been supplied.

(No. 1908 to 1909). (4) In this court, E provides the defendant with the above sampling via non-data at the time of showing it.