The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (a 1 year of imprisonment, a 500,000 won additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and cooperation with the investigation.

However, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, he/she repeatedly handles penphones during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the defendant is highly punished in light of the fact that he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than one year and four months.

However, considering the fact that the sentence imposed by the court below is the lowest sentence on the sentencing guidelines, and other various conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too large.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.