A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 12. 15. 21:00경 남양주시 B 앞 노상에서, 술에 취한 남자가 쓰러져 있다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 남양주경찰서 C지구대 소속 경사 D, 순경 E이 피고인에게 “도움이 필요합니까 댁이 어디세요 ”라고 묻자 “뭐 씹할 내가 잘못한 거 있어 경찰 씹할 좆 같은 것”이라고 욕설을 하며 도움을 거절하고, 위 D, E이 순찰차량을 타고 이동하려는 중 갑자기 차량 앞 도로에 서서 길을 막고 피고인의 옷깃을 잡고 인도 쪽으로 이끄는 E에게 “넌 저리 꺼져. 이 새끼야”라고 욕설을 하며 손으로 E의 오른팔을 뒤로 꺾어 밀치고, 위 D, E이 피고인을 현행범인 체포한 뒤 D 운전의 순찰차량 뒷좌석에 태워 위 C지구대로 가던 중 주먹으로 D이 앉아있는 운전석 뒷부분을 주먹으로 수회 치고, 순찰차량 중간 칸막이를 발로 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police D and E crime prevention and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months). [Determination of sentence] The defendant committed the crime of this case in spite of the fact that the defendant was punished for a crime of the same kind of crime two times, it should be criticized for the fact that he committed the crime of this case.

For this reason, although the choice of imprisonment with prison labor cannot be avoided against the defendant, the defendant is subject to punishment of imprisonment with prison labor or heavier punishment for the past ten years, since all of the crimes in this case were led to the court.