Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:22 on March 13, 2020, the police officer C, who belongs to the police station B District B, had been dispatched to the said district by the Defendant’s father’s her husband’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

At around 00:52 on the same day, the Defendant entered the said global belt and called “D, I Do,” and said, “I Do, I Do,” and the police officer F Do, a police officer belonging to the said global belt, stated “I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I

Accordingly, the Defendant told police officers that “I will be held responsible if I believe you are wrong. I will not be responsible. I will Mad.” In order for C to prevent the Defendant from selling his arms, “I will saw I will see, I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and F;

1. Application of 112 reported case processing lists and CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of fines (including the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the degree of violence inflicted on police officers who suffered damage, and the previous records of punishment of the defendant);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;