beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a rocketing car in the manner of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;
On December 22, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on December 22, 2015, and proceeded along the four-lane road in front of the M gas station L at the time of woodbling along the direction of the stadium in the direction of the head of the pharmacy.
Since there is a place where the central separation cost is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care not to proceed to the opposite lane by breaking the central line.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim PP bus of Q Newland, which was stopped on a four-lane, to go ahead of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle, by neglecting it and neglecting it. The Defendant: (a) caused the victim PP bus of the victim PP which was stopped on the right side in order to avoid the Defendant’s driving vehicle; and (b) caused the victim PP bus of Q Newland, which was parked on the fourth-lane, to drive the NV vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the said victims, such as the “finites and tensions,” which requires treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence, and the Defendant scrapped the volume of N-ro vehicle, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying Q New Zealand’s bus to repair cost to the extent that it would amount to KRW 3,018,169, and providing relief to the victims at the site.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) without a driver’s license.
3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the said Crocketing car not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police officer forO and P.