logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.21 2016가단5007893
대여금
Text

1. As to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant A Co., Ltd., the amount of KRW 6,245,99,147 and KRW 1,246,426,864.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Grounds for recognition (1) Defendant A: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act), Defendant B: Decision by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The Plaintiff’s claim determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim transferred the above claim to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor during the instant lawsuit period. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor is justified, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow